By Peninah Mbula | The Common Pulse/latest news/US/India/ Kenya/Abroad/Africa / September 2025.
A Diplomatic Bombshell.
In a startling interview aired on 28 September 2025, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick shook diplomatic circles with his remark that the United States must “fix” several countries, including India, Switzerland, and Brazil, over what he described as unfair trade practices and closed markets. The statement comes just days after a high-level Indian delegation concluded bilateral trade negotiations in Washington, leaving observers to wonder how this blunt rhetoric will affect ongoing diplomacy.
Lutnick’s message was unequivocal: India cannot continue unfettered access to the US market unless it aligns with the Trump administration’s trade agenda. In his interview with News Nation, he stated:
"You want to sell your goods in the US? Then you must coordinate with President Trump."
He emphasized that India must respond appropriately to these demands, signaling a sharp departure from traditional diplomatic language and reflecting a more aggressive US trade posture under the current administration.
India’s Trade Mission: Fast-Tracking Negotiations
From 22–24 September 2025, India’s Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal led a high-powered delegation to Washington to discuss a Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) and potential investment opportunities. Meetings with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Ambassador-designate Sergio Gor concluded with both sides agreeing to fast-track negotiations for a deal that could benefit both economies.
Analysts note that India has been careful to balance economic engagement with strategic autonomy, signaling its willingness to negotiate without compromising its global partnerships, including its participation in BRICS.
Lutnick’s Three Conditions: The Hard Line
The US Commerce Secretary made it clear that removing the 25% additional tariff on Indian goods comes with strict prerequisites:
Cease purchasing oil from Russia a clear geopolitical maneuver aimed at pressuring India in global energy markets.
Withdraw from BRICS undermining India’s multilateral economic collaborations.
Support the United States diplomatically aligning India’s foreign policy with US interests.
Beyond these, Lutnick suggested that India would need to apologize and negotiate directly with President Trump, indicating that future agreements would be shaped entirely by US terms and finalized with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
This ultimatum has sparked intense discussion among trade analysts, many of whom view it as a test of India’s negotiating leverage and strategic independence.
Diplomatic Repercussions: Strained Relations Ahead
Lutnick’s blunt statement, “We have to fix India,” has raised eyebrows across global diplomatic circles. While India has not officially responded, analysts suggest these remarks could:
-
Complicate ongoing negotiations by injecting uncertainty.
-
Test India’s strategic autonomy amid pressure to align with US interests.
-
Influence investor sentiment, potentially affecting trade flows and foreign direct investment discussions.
This kind of high-stakes rhetoric is rare in trade diplomacy and signals a more transactional, hardline US approach, raising questions about long-term bilateral relations.
Economic and Strategic Stakes: What’s at Risk
India’s trade relationship with the US is critical. The American market represents a significant share of India’s exports, from textiles to technology services. Compliance with Lutnick’s conditions could have sweeping consequences:
-
Ceasing Russian oil imports may strain India’s energy security.
-
Exiting BRICS could isolate India from key emerging-market collaborations.
Aligning diplomatically with the US may limit India’s maneuverability in global forums.
The stakes are high, and the negotiation outcome could reshape global trade dynamics, affecting not just India and the US, but also broader geopolitical alliances.
Navigating a High-Stakes Trade Future
As negotiations continue, India faces a delicate balancing act: securing favorable trade terms while maintaining strategic independence. The coming weeks are pivotal. Whether India accedes to US demands or asserts its autonomy will have long-term implications for bilateral relations, regional geopolitics, and global trade patterns.
For readers and analysts alike, this unfolding story is a reminder that geopolitics and trade are intertwined, and every statement from a high-ranking official can ripple across economies and digital platforms.

Comments
Post a Comment